Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Torpedo

Grandpa Tom.

He isn’t a character. He is a stand-up kind of guy. You know; for those of you who are not from America, that means that he is reliable, takes initiative when he needs to, doesn’t speak out of turn, but will tell you what he thinks if he thinks it will help.

He was a teacher for most of his life. In work and out. And he makes me laugh. He is also a bit of a trickster, or at least has a fast tongue. He is shuffling about upstairs now. And getting in to bed, slowly, with patience like only a wise man can.

Last night he sat and just talked about some of his memories to us. Therapeutic like. For us more than for him I think, though I am sure he enjoyed it. There is a lot of wisdom there, but some tom-foolery too. (His name is Tom, so I guess its fitting). Anyway, he was telling us about how he was selected to become an officer for the Navy during the second world war. He had just proposed to my grandmother (she said at the time she was not ready… and quite right too. Tom was 18 and she a bit younger!) and so Grandpa, who was studying to be a teacher at some university between Cornwall (grandpa is Cornish!) and England, signed up for training.

He said last night that it was not because of my grandmothers pause for thought that he joined up, but because he would have done it anyway… I trust he would have. He said to us that he was teething to go to war, though at other times he has talked about the meaninglessness of it all. He is still sore about the Japanese, though he has forgiven them. Most of his squadron (he trained to be a pilot in the Navy) died over on the other side of the world. But he tells anecdotes about officers from Germany and the UK meeting after the war, remembering, shaking hands, having a drink and perhaps forgiving each other.

So he was in front of this panel. There were Officers from the Navy interviewing new recruits from the college where he was being trained to become a teacher. I imagine some stark, not so well lit room with some wooden paneling on the wall. A long “high table”, behind it some men in uniform, and in front an 18 year old; my grandfather… an 18 year old Grandfather with all the confidence an 18 year can have (an I am sure he had less than my grandfather has now) and the 18 year old, who is not yet married, much less a father or grandfather sitting there answering what my grandpa last night called: “silly questions”.

My granny and grandpa had met some time before on a bit of a blind date. She was a cousin of Tom’s friend, who wanted to take another girl out but needed Tom to take care of his cousin for the evening. Grandpa called it a blind date, but I am sure he didn’t have a bag over his head. Well, he knew a chap who had a rowing boat and so he took Margaret out on a boat ride to the edge of a farm that  was on the river. The farm had an apple orchard. So being the adventuring types Tom and Margaret (Granny) went and picked some apples. They where chased away from the field by the farmer and have still not been caught.

I am sure they chuckled at the excitement, laughed their way home and enjoyed the taken apples.

When Grandpa was sitting before the panel they asked him some questions to see what he was about. Grandpa later found out that one of his tutors talked to the officers interviewing him about deferral, as the tutor wanted Tom to finish his teacher training course. Well this 18 year old Grandpa, who sat before the panel, wanted to go and he went, but before he could  he was asked a silly question: “What would you do if you were in a playground and you saw a U-boat?”

Last night Grandpa told us that sometimes lucky lines come to his head and that he is happy when they do. Well the 18 year old Naval-officer-to-be answered like a bullet out of a gun muzzle: ” I would torpedo it sir!”

To which the Naval Officer retorted: “But where would you get the Torpedo?”

“Well”, Grandpa said, “the same place you got the U-boat!”

Grandpa was accepted for naval training.

Words seen on a bookshelf

The People and Ideas that shaped the Modern Mind

 

Gemainsames Leben (A life togehter)

No Graves as Yet

 

Sacred Causes

Set in Darkness

We in Europe

Undefiled

 

Remembering our Future

Main Kampf

Explaining Hitler (Rosenbaum!) 

The Rise and Fall of Communism

 

Barack Obama, The Hungry Soul.

Pastoral Counceling

Across Cultures

 

Are you Nobody?

A Terrible Beauty, A Secular Age

Sculpting in Time, A Beautiful Mind 

I believe in Father Christmas

I always have and I hope I always will. He’s always closer than you think.

Greg Lake sings about it. This version has the Empire State Youth Coral. Thought that was fitting after the last blog post. Forgive the 90s look.

And if you are looking for some good Christmas music to add to your Spotify playlist I recommend this article in Relevant. (Props to Anna M as she is now known)

I wish this was a song about the Kingdom of God… and who knows maybe it is. I love the playfulness of this song too. So much hope.

(Edit: Sorry Viacom took this down… Basically Stephen Colbert Raps about being middle class and from the suburbs… over Keys exaltation of NY: “theres nothing you cann’t do down here in the New York… these streets l’make you fell bran’ new… such a melting pot, on the corner selling rock… preachers selling god…”)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMYb8sq-jDU&annotation_id=annotation_808681&feature=iv

Props to Laura K. NY Baby!

Pucket

A friend of mine has invented a table top game equivalent of tennis and table hockey all over a lovely wooden fair trade board! What a wonderful game.

read more about it here: http://www.pucket.co.uk/

Lovely!

Docu-Cause Comedy

Alex Riley, a comedian from Sheffield, has done some culinary explorations into the world of nasty foodstuffs at the BBC. Having worked on a TV show called Mischief Manifesto he is now particularly interested in ridiculing parts of the food industry in the not so subtly named: Britain’s Really Disgusting Food. While he isn’t much like Morgan Spurlock –the guy who stared in Super Size Me– they both assume that humor and satire work well as a medium to create relatively effective and partialy entertaining educational documentaries. This is exiting for me because it seem comedy does indeed stand for something.

For the most part Rileys Disgusting Food doesn’t make you want to go out and eat the product he is trying to disgust you with, which was what happened to me after I watched Super Size Me. I think this is because I don’t, on a regular basis (by which I mean more than once every two months), eat the food products that Riley has a problem with. On the other hand the ridiculous assumption in Super Size Me that most of the obese population are that way because they eat fast food irritated me, since it’s not just fast food but a combination of lifestyle choices, which includes fast food but probably is down to over snaking and a lack of excercise.

Environmentally sensitive burger

However, both Super Size Me and Disgusting Foods are a bit messy with how they apply strict standards of journalistic integrity. This concerned me because I find I get cynical about inaccurate or unfairly argued points of view. The main criticism that is leaveled against Spurlock is that he claims to take in about 5000 calories a day, which is actually quite hard to do at McDonald’s, provided you eat a regular amount of food, you don’t have two or three Big Mac meals for dinner. Other criticism can be read on wiki.

Disgusting Food has not seen so much critical attention pointed in its direction, but thats perhaps because it hardly grossed the same amount at the box office. For the most part I think Riley is accurate and fair, but there are times when he does not allow for the right of reply, making it seem like he wants to control the story more than he wants to get behind the truth. Funny enough though, he opts for some interesting stunts where one does see how situation, advertising and the right sort of language show how gullible some parts of the human species are. In each episode, Riley goes out and tries to reproduce some of the nasty food stuffs that can be found in supermarkets or corner shops. In one episode he replicates a beef burger which has less than 50% beef then serves it up as a delicacy to some night-time town revelers, some of whom love the stuff. In the same episode he makes a chicken Kiev with less than 11% chicken and serves it as an alternatively sourced food product at a “green” market in some posh area. Needless to say, people love it.

While I think that the Docu-Cause Comedy is not a perfect translation of a documentary or news story that has integrity and fact check-ability, alongside the right of reply, I still think it’s a great form of entertaining TV, which gives the honest and moderate consumer something to think about. Great stuff.

Thought you might enjoy this article by Ruth Gledhill of the Times. Basically Charlotte and Ollie are the children of very evangelical parents. They are also the smiley faces on the latest atheist bus campaign, which urges parents not to label their children until they can make up their own mind about who or what they are. You know, Ollie the Christian, Charlotte the Humanist, Chris-Hitch the Anti-Theist or Jeff the Jehovah’s Witness.

Semena Santa Parade, Seville, Spain

Part of me is sympathetic with the campaign if only because I know people, good friends of mine, who are no longer Christians. They suffered the effects of a divorce from powerful childhood manipulation. Their experience of Christianity was a fight with parents and a sub-cultures that was laced with acid, illogical guilt trips and control freakery more akin to the religiosity Jesus criticised in the Pharisees than cheekily following the Son of God into Jerusalem riding on a donkey. I would say that what my friends experienced isn’t what Christianity is about, but since parents are only human I would expect that some of that goes on in any household where a child is brought up. That’s no excuse for psychological child abuse, it’s just that in some households things are worse than in others. It’s sad that these friends are no longer Christians, but the fact that they suffer guilt is human. Which brings me to the other point, which is that I have friends who are no longer Christians but not because of how they were brought up. They also suffer guilt and it has taken some of them a lot of time to rid themselves of feelings associated with their upbringing. However, we all have baggage. As Julian Barnes says in England England, anybody who carries it around and blames their parents after the age of 26 is just a little too immature and needs to grow up.

The other part of me says, hey Dawkins, don’t be a fool and a hypocrite. Don’t you understand that there is no such thing as a neutral space to bring a child up in? Get over yourself.

Paul Woolley argues the point better on the Current Debate section of the Public Theology Think Tank called Theos.

Another good read on this topic by James Cary, comedy writer and maker of mince meat.

Stand Up, Comedy.

As I have explained in another place over the last year I have consumed an inordinate amount of comedy (often stand up comedy) because I am working on articulating a theology of laughter. The reason I have subjected myself to the tedium of the overly ironic, the blasphemy of incredulous wit and the imaginary cymbal chimes that inevitably follow after bad punnery is because I think comedy and by extension irony and ridicule are extremely powerful social tools for persuasion and sadly also for keeping people alienated or ‘in their place.’ I think its a shame that more stand up comedy doesn’t give us hope or energize us to change what they themselves criticise.

Dog wearing sunglasses

The last year of research was often very amusing, educating, though at times I realized that I was, in the words of Joe Moran, pursuing laughter as an end in itself and not something beyond laughter. I think many of the comedians I saw were doing the same. At the Edinburgh Fringe Festival I wondered whether the people who go to so many shows over the month of August because they are the professionals, or the reviewers, suffer from withdrawal symptoms? They could either miss the rush of standing up ahead of an audience, or as an audience member because they enjoy the comedy others produce. Take away the endorphin induced pleasure and you feel a bit down. But its not just the physiological effects of the giggles that I think might be problematic. Stand up comedy lacks a critical lens.  It’s just consumed without thought. The creativity which goes into the show often does not drive others to be creative about solving problems.

Moran observes that stand up comedy in the UK has become one of the dominant art forms much like the novel did in the last century. This seems true if one looks at the EFF schedule, which is mostly comedy and is far larger than the original festival. Many west-end theaters offer stand up rather than drama or musicles. Mock the Week, Have I Got News For You or Nevermind the Buzzcocks regularly top the BBC i Player most played list, while stand up comedians such as Jimmy Carr, Michael McIntyre or Bill Bailey are household names. They’re like rock stars. But as one of the dominant forms of art and entertainment in the UK, Moran says it is often produced and consumed without a critical lens. Comedy is fun and distracting but it is quite rare that the consumer takes a step back from the punch line to worry about what the implications of the jest actually are. This is partly because the comedy on offer is just not trying to do anything but entertain. There is nothing wrong with seeking entertainment or making a living out of gags, I just don’t want that to be all comedy does. In a show I want to hear a shout from the audience like when some rap artist or singer song writer makes a comment about society and from somewhere in the back a burly masculine voice says: “Preach it!”

Elvis Presley Impersonator Preaching by a Microphone in a Church

Similarly another commentator at the Guardian and a Christian, Theo Hobson, points out that stand up comedy has its tradition in the “essential performance-art of our Protestant past: preaching”. While I am not sure that this is completely true it does offer up a good comparison. By holding an audience in rapt attention the preacher, whether of the humorous variety or not, joins a group of listeners into a body willing to hear some swine pearls. I think what Hobson should have said is that both preaching and stand up comedy have there roots in rhetoric, something we will get to a little later. Continue Reading »

Laughter

Dog wearing sunglasses

Though I enjoyed comedy in the past, I never sought it out like I might have done an action film, or a good novel. This has changed. Over the last year I have gone to stand up comedy shows, watched comedy online and borrowed DVDs. I have listened to topical news comedy and game show laughter-making on the radio. Perhaps the highlight and the most jam-packed chuckle hunting time during this last year was attending the Edinburgh Fringe Festival (EFF) for just over 3 days as part of our holiday in which we saw 10 live comedy performances. Almost too much laughter.

I subjected myself to this new hobby because I am working on an MA dissertation relating theology and politics to humour and trying to work out what the role of laughter and comedy has in the interrelationship of God, the political and a better society. It’s sort of a step toward a theology of laughter.

For all the hilarity of the year-long research project I am not much happier or filled with joy. Also, sadly given that the jester is often called the conscience of society, I don’t have a clearer understanding of the ills in our culture either. Though I do now know that wit and humour will allow you to get away with a multitude of sins and let ideas sneak by walls of defense that would otherwise well and truly block any change of opinion the jester might be looking for.

The other surprising effect of my consumption of comedy is that there are times I am saddened because of it. That’s not what comedy should, do is it? Don’t misunderstand. While consuming comedy (because that’s usually what we do when taking in a show) I usually laugh a lot. I enjoy it and will continue to enjoy it, but comedy doesn’t always make us joyful. It is often powerfully cynical and doesn’t offer hope, solace or real mirth.

I will be writing about various aspects of comedy and laughter on this blog, as a part of the ongoing work and hope to generate some discussion about the topic. Hopefully it will be thoughtful. At times it will be a matter of reviewing a show, or aggregating comments and interesting articles that come up in the press from time to time.

Please point me in the right direction.

self sacrifice

True metaphysical claim?

Older Posts »